Quantum urbanism and the NFT nexus: Redefining virtual land value in decentralized cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT250811010DKeywords:
quantum urbanism, NFT, virtual, land, decentralized citiesAbstract
The intersection of quantum urbanism and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) offers a new paradigm for remapping urban futures, wherein digital and physical realms merge into dynamic, decentralized ecosystems. This article examines how quantum computing, by applying principles such as superposition and probabilistic optimization, can simulate extremely intricate urban systems, from energy networks to traffic patterns, with unprecedented efficiency. Meanwhile, NFTs are transforming the notion of virtual land ownership, allowing decentralized control and hybrid economies that bypass geographical constraints. By integrating these domains, cities can become vibrant spaces where quantum algorithms optimize virtual land value, and NFT-based platforms democratize urban development. However, this transformation poses fundamental challenges: the energy consumption of quantum-blockchain infrastructures risks compromising sustainability goals, while algorithmic opacity and digital divides risk reproducing historical inequalities in virtual realms. Ethical governance policy and principles must concentrate on renewable energy integration, algorithmic transparency, and fair access to prevent exploitation. Drawing from emergent metaverse economy trials and quantum urban simulations, the paper argues that such a nexus would be capable of driving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely SDG 9 (innovation), SDG 11 (sustainable cities), and SDG 17 (partnerships) if they are premised on participatory design and cross-sectoral collaboration.
References
Alvarez León, L. F., Rosen, J. (2024). Land, reconfigured: Defying the laws of physics, upholding the rules of the market in the metaverse, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241257115
Bai, Y., Hu, Q., Seo, S. H., Kang, K., Lee, J. J. (2022). Public participation consortium blockchain for smart city governance, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 2094-2108. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3091151
Balcerzak, A. P., Nica, E., Rogalska, E., Poliak, M., Klieštik, T., Sabie, O. M. (2022). Blockchain technology and smart contracts in decentralized governance systems, Administrative Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 3, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030096
Crandall, J. (2023). Living on the block: How equitable is tokenized equity?, Big Data and Society, Vol. 10, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231208455
Criqui, L. (2015). Infrastructure urbanism: Roadmaps for servicing unplanned urbanisation in emerging cities, Habitat International, Vol. 47, pp. 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.015
Giraldo-Quintero, A., Lalinde-Pulido, J. G., Duque, J. C., Sierra-Sosa, D. (2022). Using quantum computing to solve the maximal covering location problem, Computational Urban Science, Vol. 2, article number 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00070-x
Gloerich, I., De Waal, M., Ferri, G., Cila, N., Karpinski, T. (2020). The City as a License. Implications of Blockchain and Distributed Ledgers for Urban Governance, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Vol. 2, 534942. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.534942
Gonçalves, J. E., Ioannou, I., Verma, T. (2024). No one-size-fits-all: Multi-actor perspectives on public participation and digital participatory platforms, Philosophical Transactions A, Vol. 382, No. 2285, 20240111. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0111
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Goyal, A., Kanhere, S. S., Guizani, N. (2020). Forthcoming applications of quantum computing: peeking into the future, IET Quantum Communication, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-qtc.2020.0026
Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Carpentras, D., Menendez, M., Pournaras, E., Thurner, S., Verma, T., Arcaute, E., Batty, M., Bettencourt, L. M. (2024). Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance, Philosophical Transactions A, Vol. 382, No. 2285, 20240113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0113
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., Witte, P. (2022a). Smart urban governance: An alternative to technocratic “smartness”, GeoJournal, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 1639-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
Jiang, S., Jakobsen, K., Bueie, J., Li, J., Haro, P. H. (2022b). A tertiary review on blockchain and sustainability with focus on Sustainable Development Goals, IEEE access, Vol. 10, pp. 114975-115006. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.18480509.v3
Khan, Z., Abbasi, A. G., Pervez, Z. (2020). Blockchain and edge computing–based architecture for participatory smart city applications, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Vol. 32, No. 12, e5566. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5566
Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W. D. (2019). A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied physics reviews, Vol. 6, No. 2, 021318. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550
Liang, X., Yuan, Q., Guo, Y., Lu, J. (2023). Struggling with inequality and the uncertain reterritorialization of migrants: A case study of Guangzhou, Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, Vol. 2. No. 4, pp. 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223231217436
Marchesin, A., Montrucchio, B., Graziano, M., Boella, A., Mondo, G. (2023). Improving urban traffic mobility via a versatile quantum annealing model, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, Vol. 4, pp. 1-13, 3101713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2023.3312284
Nurjaman, M. I., Al-Hakim, S., Setiawan, I., Sahid, M. M. (2022). Analysis of Buying, Selling, and Leasing Virtual Land in the Metaverse: A Perspective from Sharia Economic Law, Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 12-26. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v6i1.22782
Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum, Vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
Robins, S., Baumgardt, L. (2024). Opening the Black Box of Urban Development: Cultural Heritage Activism at the Amazon Megaproject in Cape Town, Theoria, Vol. 71, No. 178, pp. 24-47. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2024.7117802
Sifah, E. B., Xia, H., Cobblah, C. N. A., Xia, Q., Gao, J., Du, X. (2020). BEMPAS: a decentralized employee performance assessment system based on blockchain for smart city governance, IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 99528-99539. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997650
Thompson, M., Lorne, C. (2023). Designing a New Civic Economy? On the Emergence and Contradictions of Participatory Experimental Urbanism, Antipode, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12962
Treiblmaier, H., Rejeb, A., Strebinger, A. (2020). Blockchain as a Driver for Smart City Development: Application Fields and a Comprehensive Research Agenda, Smart Cities, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 853-872. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3030044
Voskamp, I. M., Stremke, S., Spiller, M., Perrotti, D., van der Hoek, J. P., Rijnaarts, H. H. (2017). Enhanced performance of the Eurostat method for comprehensive assessment of urban metabolism: A material flow analysis of Amsterdam, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 887-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12461
Wong, P. F., Chia, F. C., Kiu, M. S., and Lou, E. C. (2022). Potential integration of blockchain technology into smart sustainable city (SSC) developments: a systematic review, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 559-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-09-2020-0140
Xu, M., Niyato, D., Yang, Z., Xiong, Z., Kang, J., Kim, D. I., Shen, X. (2023). Privacy-preserving intelligent resource allocation for federated edge learning in quantum internet, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2022.3224591
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Spatium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
