The dynamism of urban memory: Investigating the afforded meanings and habits of a historic khan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT260125002D

Keywords:

urban, memory, narratives, sketches, khan

Abstract

This paper uses affordance theory and the 4EA approach – extended, embodied, embedded, enacted, and affective cognition – to show how embodied cognition and environmental affordances shape urban memory. The activation of urban senses through affordances highlights how technological apparatuses can express what already exists in experiences, but is yet to be examined. The narrative flow of the city, beginning with operative behaviours and roles, is enhanced and complemented by student sketches of the urban fabric, driven by structural elements, which together evoke a similar sense of memory but in different ways. Drawing on students’ narratives and sketches of Alacahan, a historic khan in Trabzon, Türkiye, the paper explores how architecture can affectively shape and be shaped by urban actors. Consequently, this paper suggests a theoretical and pedagogical framework based on sketches and narratives as technological apparatuses to investigate how vital memories and habits of urban fabrics enable new meanings and values to produce urban appropriation and sustainability. The sensory landscape of Alacahan, with its rhythm of copper work, cool air, sharp metallic scents, and the reverberations of timber and stone, collectively forms a living, multisensory urban memory. This framework shows that architectural experience and its dynamic habits persist in sketches, stories, and activities, embedding architecture in embodied cognition.

References

Aygün, N. (2021). The economic order of the city. In T. Öztürk (Ed.), Conquest and the city of Trabzon. Trabzon: Trabzon Metropolitan Municipality Cultural Publications, pp. 219–255.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Deleuze, G. (2011). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. New York: Continuum.

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Dreyfus, H. L. (2009). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: the MIT Press.

Durmuş Öztürk, S., Bali, A. (2024). A Narrative Frame of the City: Perceiving, Telling, Sketching and Writing in Urban Places. In Ö. Öztürk (Ed.), Archtheo ‘24, XVIII. International Theory and History of Architecture Conference- Proceedings Book. İstanbul: BILSAS, pp. 155-163.

Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.

Goldhagen, S. W. (2017). Welcome to your world: How the built environment shapes our lives. New York: Harper Collins.

Gözübüyük Tamer, M. (2024). A historical place in the service of lifelong learning: Trabzon Alacahan, The Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Karadeniz Technical University, Vol. 14, No. 28, pp. 159–183 [online]. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sbed/article/1383582 [Accessed: 23 Jan 2026]

Havik, K., Sioli, A. (2021). Stories for architectural imagination, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2021.1947670

Ingold, T. (2001). From complementarity to obviation: On dissolving the boundaries between social and biological anthropology, archaeology and psychology. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 255–279.

Juarrero, A. (2023). Context Changes Everything: How Constraints Create Coherence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Kulper, P. (2020). A (drawn) practice(d) construction: Relational structuring, chased. In M. Butcher, M. O’Shea (Eds.), Expanding fields of architectural discourse and practice. London: UCL Press, pp. 192–213.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Massumi, B. (2021). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

Noë, A. (2006). Action in perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Pallasmaa, J. (2020). Landscapes and Horizons of Architecture: Architecture and Artistic Thought. In J. Pallasmaa, M. Zambelli (Eds.), Inseminations: Seeds for Architectural Thought. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 16-17.

Protevi, J. (2010). Adding Deleuze to the mix, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, pp. 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9171-1

Radman, A. (2022). Ecologies of architecture: Essays on territorialisation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474483032

Sennett, R. (1996). Flesh and stone: The body and the city in western civilization. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Seymen Aksu, N., Aydın Türk, Y. (2021). Craft and craft spaces from the past to the present: Example of Trabzon city, Art-Sanat, No. 15, pp. 317–345. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2021.15.0013

Simondon, G. (2020). Individuation in light of notions of form and information. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Spinoza, B. de (1996). Ethics. London: Penguin Books.

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Unarcode Project Archive (2025). An Investigation of the Living Urban Image With Urban Narrative Codes - Unarcode© [Unpublished research data, TÜBİTAK 2515 COST Action Members R&D Support Program, Project No: 223K212]. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University.

United Nations (UN) (2017). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Publications [online]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals [Accessed: 23 Jan 2026].

Üstün Demirkaya, F., Kırcı, O. (2020). Travellers who tell about their hometown: Trabzon in the texts of travellers from Trabzon, Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, No. 43, pp. 435–466. https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.756108

Walker, A., O’Mahony, K., Boyer, K. (2023). Recollecting the everyday: Emotion, memory and spaces of mundane practice, Emotion, Space and Society, Vol. 48, 100961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2023.100961

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Paper